Vessel Selection Criteria
The Terms of Sale (Incoterms for
example) determine who (Seller or Buyer) will nominate a vessel. However,
notwithstanding the Incoterm to be used, in the Contract of Sale, there should
be an agreement that vessels selected fulfil certain norms listed below.
In the case of bulk cargoes, as a
trader you will approach a ship broker to select a vessel. If you advise the
broker along following lines, the latter will have a clear idea of type of
vessel (and documentation) you have in mind.
The ship broker should provide
the following information to you:
1. Name of vessel with IMO Number[1]
2. Flag [2]
3. Year of Build [3]
4. Class (to be as per IACS) [4]
5. P&I (to be member of IG of Clubs) [5]
6. Confirmation that vessel has“Owners’ & Charterers’
liability for cargo loss or damage” [6]
7. H&M Insurance details (Name of Insurers,
Amount of Insurance) [7]
8. Vessel is a Singleton or one belonging to a
fleet? [8]
9. ISM with DOC [9]
10 Name of Owners/Disponent Owners/Managers of vessel
(if possible) [10]
11. Detention by Port State Control-details of [11]
12. Previous voyages (say last 6 voyages) made by
the vessel with details [12]
Explanatory Notes:
[1]IMO
number is important and you must insist on this information from your ship brokers
who recommend vessels to you. The IMO number is unique to the
vessel and remains with it for life. Often vessel names “sound” familiar
but when you check in Lloyd’s database, you don’t find the vessel-IMO number is
therefore a must. IMO number is also important as in some cases there are
multiple ships carrying the same name, or the vessel name has changed but the
various databases are not updated. It also enables your insurer to check vessel
details from websites such as Sea Searcher or Equasis.
2] Flag: To equate all FOC[1]
vessels with sub-standard operation is a wrong notion. However some Flags do
have a higher share of casualties. There
are flags which are blacklisted by EU. There are
[others who have had a
poor record in terms of safety and maintenance. In the case of FOC’s there is
also the question of the beneficial Owners and the real Owners of the vessels
hiding behind a corporate veil. Some of the FOCs have not ratified important
international conventions such as SOLAS.
The top 11 FOCs in terms of percentage of the
world fleet in DWT terms are Panama, Liberia, Marshal Islands, Bahamas, Malta,
Cyprus, Antigua, Bermuda, St. Vincent, France RS, Cayman and Islands
[3]Year of
Build: This is important as Overage Premium would be higher for older
vessels-especially bulk carriers. If you are the buyer and the vessel is
selected by your suppliers, then it is sometimes possible to debit the OAP to
the suppliers account. Older vessels, particularly old bulk carriers are viewed
with concern as these vessels deteriorate rapidly due to stress created by
dense bulk cargoes, use of grabs, high speed loading& unloading etc.
Vessels, irrespective of
the type, have similar experience during the first 10 years of their lives.
However different types of vessels deteriorate at different rates after this.
For example, tankers deteriorate in the 15-19 year age group whereas dry bulk
carriers do in the 20-24 year age group. It is a fact however that majority of
total losses pertain to older the vessels (especially bulk carriers).
[4]Class: The IACS (the International Association of
Classification Societies) has currently 13 members (there are several other
Classification Societies but a Society which is a member of the IACS gives the
cargo Owners/Charterers and their Insurers the necessary comfort)
Also the current edition of the
Institute Classification Clause has a limited held cover provision for non IACS
societies and therefore while selecting a vessel care should be taken that the
vessel is entered with an IACS member’s class or get a specific approval of
cargo insurers in writing in case such a vessel is not available.
The IACS members are:
1
|
American
Bureau of Ships
|
ABS
|
2
|
Bureau
Veritas
|
BV
|
3
|
China
Classification Society
|
CCS
|
4
|
Croatian Register of Shipping
|
CRS
|
5
|
Det
Norske Veritas
|
DNV
|
6
|
Germanischer Lloyd SE
|
GL
|
7
|
Korean
Register of Shipping
|
KR
|
8
|
Indian
Register of Shipping
|
IRS
|
9
|
Lloyd’s
Register of Shipping
|
LR
|
10
|
Nippon
Kaiji Kyokai
|
NK
|
11
|
Polski
Rejestr Statków
|
PRS
|
12
|
Registro
Italiano Navale
|
RINA
|
13
|
Russian
Maritime Register of Shipping
|
RS
|
[5]The International Group of Clubs (as opposed to
Fixed Cost Clubs): there are 13 separate and independent principal Clubs in the
International Group. Some Clubs have affiliated and reinsured subsidiary
association and these names are given as footnotes below:
i.
i.
American
Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association, Inc
ii.
Gard
P&I (Bermuda) Ltd[1]
iii.
iii Skuld
Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association (Bermuda) Ltd[2]
iv.
The
Britannia Steam Ship Insurance Association Limited
v.
The Japan
Ship Owners’ Mutual Protection & Indemnity Association
vi.
The
London Steam Ship Owners’ Mutual Insurance Association Limited
vii.
The North
of England Protecting & Indemnity Association Limited
viii.
The ShipOwner’s
Mutual Protection & Indemnity Association (Luxembourg)
ix.
The
Standard Steamship Owners’ Protection & Indemnity Association (Bermuda) Limited[3]
x.
The
Steamship Mutual Underwriting Association (Bermuda) Limited[4]
xi.
The
Swedish Club
xii.
United
Kingdom Mutual Steam Ship Assurance Association (Bermuda) Limited[5]
xiii.
The west of England ShipOwners Mutual Insurance
Association (Luxembourg)
[1] Assuranceforeningen Gard
The
Standard Steamship Owners’Protection and Indemnity Association (London) Ltd.
The
Standard Steamship Owners’Protection and Indemnity Association (Asia) Ltd.
- A reinsured subsidiary association
- A reinsured subsidiary association
[5] United Kingdom Mutual
Steam ShipAssurance Association (Europe) Ltd.
These 13 Clubs of the International Group of P&I
Clubs between them provide liability cover (cargo loss and damage, injury to
crew, third party liability, wreck removal etc besides providing a wide range
of services to their members on claims, legal issues, loss prevention and play
a key role in the management of casualties) for approx. 90% of the world’s
ocean going tonnage.
Note on Fixed Cost Clubs:
A P&I
Club which is a member of the International Group is better than the so called
fixed-cost Club:
1. Recently some ports did not recognise a Fixed Club
including Mumbai port.
2. Approach to claims is far better in the case of
International Group of Clubs
3. Fixed Cost Clubs often do not provide Guarantees
etc when a vessel is arrested.
4. The IGC members have an Omnibus Clause under
which even if there is no liability, sometimes they pay claims-somewhat like a
general insurers' ex gratia settlement.
5. Even though Clubs cover 1/4th liability and
H&M 3/4ths, Clubs take the lead in collision cases. They will not hesitate
to send assistance in case of collision cases by deputing their Master Mariners
or those with legal background in such cases. Here again IGC members score over
fixed Cost Clubs.
Some
Fixed Cost Clubs have a good track record and a reference to the Insurer should
be made in such cases.
[6]A vessel
entered with P&I Club with insurance for Owners’/Charterers’ liability for
cargo loss or damage enhances the chances of recovery for a loss or damage
during sea carriage. It also enables the cargo Owner to seek Letter of
Indemnity from the Club. Sometimes a vessel has to be arrested to force the Club
to give a LOI to cargo interests. See the comments in [10] where
it has been recommended that the P& I details of intermediate Owners/Charterers
are also obtained.[7]
[7]A
vessels’ H&M Insurance is also an important source of information to verify
the quality of the vessel and its Owners. A good H&M Insurer gives comfort
to the cargo Owners of properly maintained vessel. Sometimes as part of
recovery proceedings, a Mareva Injunction (freezing the H&M claim pay out
following a total loss or a serious casualty to the ship) can be brought
through the court. This injunction can be vacated if a Bank Guarantee or a Club
LOI is forthcoming
[8]A vessel having sistership i.e., belonging to a
fleet (as opposed to be a singleton) is a better security
[9]ISM and
ISPS compliance avoids the risk of detention of vessel at intermediate ports by
Port State Control which are increasingly getting strict.
[10] Owners/ Disponent Owners/ Managers
The names
of the registered Owners, Disponent Owners/ Managers/Operators are usually available
in Equasis website (one has to subscribe to it) but it is a good idea to ask
the ship brokers to provide you with this information. The identity of the
P&I Clubs of the intermediate Owners/Charterers should also be sought. Disponent
Owner details are a good idea as well, since there may well be claims against
them in the future and it is useful to know who they are.
[11]A
vessel’s past history of detention (including the cause of such detentions) is
also gives an indication of the maintenance standard of the ship in question
[12] Previous Voyages made by the vessel: A vessel which had made several recent voyages
without any incident is also a pointer to its quality.
Equasis
provides some of these details (this is free of charge but you need to
register). Sea Searcher and other providers of vessel information provide a
password to their data-base but at a fee.
Often
cargo Owners/Charterers go for older vessels to save on freight. However
considering the high values of bulk cargoes, is such a saving worth it? In some
routes/cargoes, younger tonnages are not available. Some insurers in such cases
may ask for a survey of the ship at cargo Owner’s cost-again a couple of
thousand of dollars for survey could save millions of dollar worth of claims
On a
general note, if the vessel is old or does not have an IG Club cover or an IACS
class, money spent on a survey of the ship would be money well spent.
Finally,
I would remind cargo Owners of the importance of disclosing these facts to
insurers when obtaining coverage for the shipment.
[1] FOC Countries The following 32 countries have been declared
| Antigua
and Barbuda Bahamas Barbados Belize Bermuda (UK) Bolivia Burma Cambodia Cayman Islands Comoros Cyprus Equatorial Guinea French International Ship Register (FIS) German International Ship Register (GIS) Georgia |
Gibraltar (UK)
Honduras Jamaica Lebanon Liberia Malta Marshall Islands (USA) Mauritius Mongolia Netherlands Antilles North Korea Panama Sao Tome and Príncipe St Vincent Sri Lanka Tonga Vanuatu |
[7] You can have Head Owners–
A, Time Charterer– B, Sub Time Charterer – C and Sub Sub Time or Voyage Charterer
– D. The Club cover for C and D should also be obtained , if possible
B is the Charterer and will also be A’s disponent
Owners. Same is the case with C.
Really worth reading!!! I have seen in my experience that the Insureds are sometimes probably not aware of the inherent risks associated with not choosing a proper vessel or not doing proper homework. Perhaps its high time the cargo owners learn from episodes like MV Rak.Vessel was 1984 built and Lloyds Class was reportedly withdrawn in 2010.
ReplyDeleteKarthik, I am delighted you liked this post which shows your commitment to quality underwriting and loss prevention. I absolutely agree with you that we need to draw lessons from the past couple of years when junk vessels are calling at Asian ports particularly Indian. I have advised many to have a robust vessel selection criteria and most of them actually implement them-it is for insurers to educate the clients. Finally it is time that for old bulk carriers say more than 18 years, cargo owners should not hesitate to incur some cost and have a condition survey of the ship. A few thousand dollars is nothing compared to the substantial financial loss due to sinking, salvage, GA etc. In fact, from the marine insurance point of view, without survey of the ship, I think marine underwriters should now stop underwriting bulk cargoes if they have to protect their book's profitability. This is the only way to write bulk cargo risks
ReplyDelete