Insuring Cargo on You Tube

An Appreciation by Phillip Taylor MBE and Elizabeth Taylor of Richmond Green Chambers

Followers

Monday, December 5, 2011

How to select a Vessel



Vessel Selection Criteria

The Terms of Sale (Incoterms for example) determine who (Seller or Buyer) will nominate a vessel. However, notwithstanding the Incoterm to be used, in the Contract of Sale, there should be an agreement that vessels selected fulfil certain norms listed below.

In the case of bulk cargoes, as a trader you will approach a ship broker to select a vessel. If you advise the broker along following lines, the latter will have a clear idea of type of vessel (and documentation) you have in mind.

The ship broker should provide the following information to you:

1. Name of vessel with IMO Number[1]
2. Flag [2]
3. Year of Build [3]
4. Class (to be as per IACS) [4]
5. P&I (to be member of IG of Clubs) [5]
6. Confirmation that vessel has“Owners’ & Charterers’ liability for cargo loss or damage” [6]
7. H&M Insurance details (Name of Insurers, Amount of Insurance) [7]
8. Vessel is a Singleton or one belonging to a fleet? [8]
9. ISM with DOC [9]
10 Name of Owners/Disponent Owners/Managers of vessel (if possible) [10]
11. Detention by Port State Control-details of [11]
12. Previous voyages (say last 6 voyages) made by the vessel with details [12]

Explanatory Notes:

[1]IMO number is important and you must insist on this information from your ship brokers who recommend vessels to you. The IMO number is unique to the vessel and remains with it for life. Often vessel names “sound” familiar but when you check in Lloyd’s database, you don’t find the vessel-IMO number is therefore a must. IMO number is also important as in some cases there are multiple ships carrying the same name, or the vessel name has changed but the various databases are not updated. It also enables your insurer to check vessel details from websites such as Sea Searcher or Equasis. 


2] Flag: To equate all FOC[1] vessels with sub-standard operation is a wrong notion. However some Flags do have a higher share of casualties.  There are flags which are blacklisted by EU. There are
[others who have had a poor record in terms of safety and maintenance. In the case of FOC’s there is also the question of the beneficial Owners and the real Owners of the vessels hiding behind a corporate veil. Some of the FOCs have not ratified important international conventions such as SOLAS.

The top 11 FOCs in terms of percentage of the world fleet in DWT terms are Panama, Liberia, Marshal Islands, Bahamas, Malta, Cyprus, Antigua, Bermuda, St. Vincent, France RS, Cayman and  Islands

[3]Year of Build: This is important as Overage Premium would be higher for older vessels-especially bulk carriers. If you are the buyer and the vessel is selected by your suppliers, then it is sometimes possible to debit the OAP to the suppliers account. Older vessels, particularly old bulk carriers are viewed with concern as these vessels deteriorate rapidly due to stress created by dense bulk cargoes, use of grabs, high speed loading& unloading etc.
Vessels, irrespective of the type, have similar experience during the first 10 years of their lives. However different types of vessels deteriorate at different rates after this. For example, tankers deteriorate in the 15-19 year age group whereas dry bulk carriers do in the 20-24 year age group. It is a fact however that majority of total losses pertain to older the vessels (especially bulk carriers).

[4]Class: The IACS (the International Association of Classification Societies) has currently 13 members (there are several other Classification Societies but a Society which is a member of the IACS gives the cargo Owners/Charterers and their Insurers the necessary comfort)

Also the current edition of the Institute Classification Clause has a limited held cover provision for non IACS societies and therefore while selecting a vessel care should be taken that the vessel is entered with an IACS member’s class or get a specific approval of cargo insurers in writing in case such a vessel is not available.

The IACS members are: 
1
American Bureau of Ships
ABS
2
Bureau Veritas
BV
3
China Classification Society
CCS
4
Croatian Register of Shipping
CRS
5
Det Norske Veritas
DNV
6
Germanischer Lloyd SE
GL
7
Korean Register of Shipping
KR
8
Indian Register of Shipping
IRS
9
Lloyd’s Register of Shipping
LR
10
Nippon Kaiji Kyokai
NK
11
Polski Rejestr Statków
PRS
12
Registro Italiano Navale
RINA
13
Russian Maritime Register of Shipping
RS

[5]The International Group of Clubs (as opposed to Fixed Cost Clubs): there are 13 separate and independent principal Clubs in the International Group. Some Clubs have affiliated and reinsured subsidiary association and these names are given as footnotes below:

              
        i.           
                     i.            American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association, Inc
                    ii.            Gard P&I (Bermuda) Ltd[1]
                  iii.            iii Skuld Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association (Bermuda) Ltd[2]
                  iv.            The Britannia Steam Ship Insurance Association Limited
                    v.            The Japan Ship Owners’ Mutual Protection & Indemnity Association
                  vi.            The London Steam Ship Owners’ Mutual Insurance Association Limited
                 vii.            The North of England Protecting & Indemnity Association Limited
               viii.            The ShipOwner’s Mutual Protection & Indemnity Association (Luxembourg)
                  ix.            The Standard Steamship Owners’ Protection & Indemnity Association (Bermuda) Limited[3]
                    x.            The Steamship Mutual Underwriting Association (Bermuda) Limited[4]
                  xi.            The Swedish Club
                 xii.            United Kingdom Mutual Steam Ship Assurance Association (Bermuda) Limited[5]
               xiii.             The west of England ShipOwners Mutual Insurance Association (Luxembourg)


[1] Assuranceforeningen Gard
[2] Assuranceforeningen Skuld
[3] The Standard Steamship Owners’Protection and Indemnity Association (Europe) Ltd.
The Standard Steamship Owners’Protection and Indemnity Association (London) Ltd.
The Standard Steamship Owners’Protection and Indemnity Association (Asia) Ltd.
- A reinsured subsidiary association
[4] he Steamship Mutual Underwriting Association Ltd
[5] United Kingdom Mutual Steam ShipAssurance Association (Europe) Ltd.

These 13 Clubs of the International Group of P&I Clubs between them provide liability cover (cargo loss and damage, injury to crew, third party liability, wreck removal etc besides providing a wide range of services to their members on claims, legal issues, loss prevention and play a key role in the management of casualties) for approx. 90% of the world’s ocean going tonnage.

Note on Fixed Cost Clubs:

A P&I Club which is a member of the International Group is better than the so called fixed-cost Club:
1. Recently some ports did not recognise a Fixed Club including Mumbai port.
2. Approach to claims is far better in the case of International Group of Clubs
3. Fixed Cost Clubs often do not provide Guarantees etc when a vessel is arrested.
4. The IGC members have an Omnibus Clause under which even if there is no liability, sometimes they pay claims-somewhat like a general insurers' ex gratia settlement.
5. Even though Clubs cover 1/4th liability and H&M 3/4ths, Clubs take the lead in collision cases. They will not hesitate to send assistance in case of collision cases by deputing their Master Mariners or those with legal background in such cases. Here again IGC members score over fixed Cost Clubs.

Some Fixed Cost Clubs have a good track record and a reference to the Insurer should be made in such cases.

[6]A vessel entered with P&I Club with insurance for Owners’/Charterers’ liability for cargo loss or damage enhances the chances of recovery for a loss or damage during sea carriage. It also enables the cargo Owner to seek Letter of Indemnity from the Club. Sometimes a vessel has to be arrested to force the Club to give a LOI to cargo interests. See the comments in [10] where it has been recommended that the P& I details of intermediate Owners/Charterers are also obtained.[7]

[7]A vessels’ H&M Insurance is also an important source of information to verify the quality of the vessel and its Owners. A good H&M Insurer gives comfort to the cargo Owners of properly maintained vessel. Sometimes as part of recovery proceedings, a Mareva Injunction (freezing the H&M claim pay out following a total loss or a serious casualty to the ship) can be brought through the court. This injunction can be vacated if a Bank Guarantee or a Club LOI is forthcoming

 [8]A vessel having sistership i.e., belonging to a fleet (as opposed to be a singleton) is a better security

[9]ISM and ISPS compliance avoids the risk of detention of vessel at intermediate ports by Port State Control which are increasingly getting strict.

[10] Owners/ Disponent Owners/ Managers
The names of the registered Owners, Disponent Owners/ Managers/Operators are usually available in Equasis website (one has to subscribe to it) but it is a good idea to ask the ship brokers to provide you with this information. The identity of the P&I Clubs of the intermediate Owners/Charterers should also be sought. Disponent Owner details are a good idea as well, since there may well be claims against them in the future and it is useful to know who they are.

[11]A vessel’s past history of detention  (including the cause of such detentions) is also gives an indication of the maintenance standard of the ship in question

[12] Previous Voyages made by the vessel: A vessel which had made several recent voyages without any incident is also a pointer to its quality.

Equasis provides some of these details (this is free of charge but you need to register). Sea Searcher and other providers of vessel information provide a password to their data-base but at a fee.

Often cargo Owners/Charterers go for older vessels to save on freight. However considering the high values of bulk cargoes, is such a saving worth it? In some routes/cargoes, younger tonnages are not available. Some insurers in such cases may ask for a survey of the ship at cargo Owner’s cost-again a couple of thousand of dollars for survey could save millions of dollar worth of claims

On a general note, if the vessel is old or does not have an IG Club cover or an IACS class, money spent on a survey of the ship would be money well spent.

Finally, I would remind cargo Owners of the importance of disclosing these facts to insurers when obtaining coverage for the shipment.


[1] FOC Countries The following 32 countries have been declared

Antigua and Barbuda
Bahamas
Barbados
Belize
Bermuda (UK)
Bolivia
Burma
Cambodia
Cayman Islands
Comoros
Cyprus
Equatorial Guinea
French International Ship Register (FIS)
German International Ship Register (GIS)
Georgia
Gibraltar (UK)
Honduras
Jamaica
Lebanon
Liberia
Malta
Marshall Islands (USA)
Mauritius
Mongolia
Netherlands Antilles
North Korea
Panama
Sao Tome and Príncipe
St Vincent
Sri Lanka
Tonga
Vanuatu


[7] You can have Head Owners– A, Time Charterer– B, Sub Time Charterer – C and Sub Sub Time or Voyage Charterer – D. The Club cover for C and D should also be obtained , if possible
B is the Charterer and will also be A’s disponent Owners. Same is the case with C.

2 comments:

  1. Really worth reading!!! I have seen in my experience that the Insureds are sometimes probably not aware of the inherent risks associated with not choosing a proper vessel or not doing proper homework. Perhaps its high time the cargo owners learn from episodes like MV Rak.Vessel was 1984 built and Lloyds Class was reportedly withdrawn in 2010.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Karthik, I am delighted you liked this post which shows your commitment to quality underwriting and loss prevention. I absolutely agree with you that we need to draw lessons from the past couple of years when junk vessels are calling at Asian ports particularly Indian. I have advised many to have a robust vessel selection criteria and most of them actually implement them-it is for insurers to educate the clients. Finally it is time that for old bulk carriers say more than 18 years, cargo owners should not hesitate to incur some cost and have a condition survey of the ship. A few thousand dollars is nothing compared to the substantial financial loss due to sinking, salvage, GA etc. In fact, from the marine insurance point of view, without survey of the ship, I think marine underwriters should now stop underwriting bulk cargoes if they have to protect their book's profitability. This is the only way to write bulk cargo risks

    ReplyDelete

Blog Archive

About the Author

My Photo
Bangalore, India
Starting his career in 1981, he has been a part of senior management of multinational insurance companies in India. He has worked in international markets including 5 years in Hong Kong. He has visited a number of countries (often as a guest speaker) - United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, France, China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia, Nigeria,Zambia and Dubai. He has been a contributor to international journals including Lloyd’s List of UK. Vish is the author of Insuring Cargoes-A practical guide to its law and practice [2010] published by the prestigious Witherbys of UK. Vish has his own consultancy firm engaged in running insurance programmes of corporates. Besides marine cargo and hull & machinery, he is also well versed in other classes of business including Business Interruption. Another area of his involvement is technical training- Vish conducts high quality technical training for brokers, underwriters and claims adjusters in various parts of the world. Recently Vish was appointed as the Indian Market Consultant for Dolphin Maritime& Aviation Services