Institute
Cargo Clauses (ICC)
The 1982 version of ICC A/B/C/Air and
associated War/Strikes clauses have been replaced by the 2009 edition.
Other Clauses such as Institute Frozen Food/Bulk Oil etc Clauses are undergoing revision and will be released by the Joint Cargo Committee (JCC) soon.
Other Clauses such as Institute Frozen Food/Bulk Oil etc Clauses are undergoing revision and will be released by the Joint Cargo Committee (JCC) soon.
Many markets are yet to adopt the 2009
edition and continue to use the 1982 edition.
This article examines the 1982 edition-a later article in this series will examine 2009 edition
This article examines the 1982 edition-a later article in this series will examine 2009 edition
General
Notes
ICC A is an all risks form. The
emphasis is on risk and therefore any fortuitous loss or damage is covered
unless any of the exclusions operate.
ICC B and C are named perils Clauses.
Coverage provided by ICC (A), (B) and (C)- (applicable to both 1982 and 2009 editions):
- Actual Total Loss
- Constructive Total Loss[1]
- Particular Average i.e. partial loss to the cargo by an insured peril in case of B and C and by any fortuity/accidental cause(s) in the case of ICC (A)
- General Average Sacrifice
- General Average and Salvage Contributions
- Collision Liability (Both to Blame
- Expenses such as :
·
Survey Fee and Reconditioning costs
·
Sue & Labour expenses (those incurred to prevent/minimize
a loss)[2]
·
Forwarding Expenses (when transit is terminated short of destination)
Though not specified as such all these
clauses only cover physical loss of or damage to goods so that
claim on account of goods (otherwise in
a sound condition) arriving late so as to miss the Christmas sales will not
be admissible under these clauses.
ICC (A)
is an all risks form subject to
exclusions whereas (B) and (C) are named-perils
form (and also contain a set of exclusions). This has an implication of burden
of proof as detailed below
All Risks
is a legal term-it does not literally mean all risks-the loss or damage must be
caused by a fortuity and there are named exclusions.
Burden of Proof:
The
assured must prove, on a balance of probabilities that accidental or fortuitous
loss or damage has occurred during the period of transit covered by the policy.” However in an
all risk form such as ICC (A), the assured does not have to prove the exact
nature of the peril that caused his loss.
Under the
named-perils form such as ICC (B) and (C) the assured is required to prove on a
balance of probabilities that the loss was reasonably attributable to one of
the listed perils (compare this with the position in ICC (A) Clauses).
The
Insurer’s burden of proof: Once the assured overcomes the initial hurdle of
proving a fortuity (A) or a named peril (B or C), the burden then shifts to the
Insurer to prove an exclusion-which is a heavier burden under A clauses.
In
practical terms, the assured discharges his burden of proof by means of
documentation viz., a clean B/L and a damage/shortage report at destination.
Exclusions:
In ICC
(A) the following are the exclusions:
4.1 Wilful
misconduct of the assured
4.2 Ordinary
leakage, ordinary loss in weight or volume, or ordinary wear and tear
4.3 Insufficiency
of packing/unsuitability of packing or preparation of the
cargo (includingstowage in a container if carried out
prior to attachment of the insurance of by the assured or his servants
4.4 Inherent
Vice or nature of cargo
4.5 Loss
damage expense caused by delay even if delay is due to an insured peril
4.6 Exclusion
relating to financial insolvency or default of
shipowners/managers/charterers/operators of the vessels
4.7 Nuclear
etc exclusion
4.8 Unseaworthiness/Unfitness
4.9 War
exclusion
4.10 Strikes
exclusion
There are add-on clauses (non-Institute or manuscript wordings to override or water down some of these exclusions)-see later part of this article.
Note: These exclusions are common to A, B and C clauses but ICC
B and C have one more exclusion “deliberate damage or destruction…… by an act
of any person(s).”
Duration of Cover
8 8.1 This insurance attaches from the time
the goods leave the warehouse or place of storage at the place named herein for
the commencement of the transit, continues during the ordinary course of
transit and terminates either
8.1.1 on delivery to the Consignees' or other
final warehouse or place of storage at the destination named herein,
8.1.2 on delivery to any other warehouse or
place of storage, whether prior to or at the destination named herein, which
the Assured elect to use either
8.1.2. for storage other than in the
ordinary course of transit or
8.1.2.2 for
allocation or distribution,
or
8.1.3 on
the expiry of 60 days after completion of discharge overside of the goods
hereby insured from the oversea vessel at the final port of discharge,
whichever
shall first occur.
8.2 If,
after discharge overside from the oversea vessel at the final port of
discharge, but prior to termination of this insurance, the goods are to be
forwarded to a destination other than that to which they are insured hereunder,
this insurance, whilst remaining subject to termination as provided for above,
shall not extend beyond the commencement of transit to such other destination.
8.3 This
insurance shall remain in force (subject to termination as provided for above
and to the provisions of Clause 9 below) during delay beyond the control of the
Assured, any deviation, forced discharge, reshipment or transhipment and during
any variation of the adventure arising from the exercise of a liberty granted
to shipowners or charterers under the contract of affreightment.
Explanation
When does
the cover attach?
This happens when goods leave the warehouse/place of storage for commencement of transit. If the lorry carrying the goods gets engulfed within the warehouse complex, there is no cover since the goods have to leave the gate of the factory or the warehouse (the “threshold test”). Loading onto the vehicle parked outside the gate is covered.
Brokers often add the Loading and Unloading Clause in order to override this restriction in the 1982 edition of ICC.
This happens when goods leave the warehouse/place of storage for commencement of transit. If the lorry carrying the goods gets engulfed within the warehouse complex, there is no cover since the goods have to leave the gate of the factory or the warehouse (the “threshold test”). Loading onto the vehicle parked outside the gate is covered.
Brokers often add the Loading and Unloading Clause in order to override this restriction in the 1982 edition of ICC.
When does
the cover terminate? It will be noted that Clause 8 provides for a number of
situations when cover might terminate:
When
goods are delivered to the Consignees’ warehouse or any place of storage. Thus
if goods are unloaded at port of discharge but the assured decides to put the
goods in a bonded warehouse for his convenience (e.g. lack of storage space in
his warehouse/factory or waiting for exchange rate to be in his favour before
he clears the goods from customs etc), cover terminates when goods enter the
bonded warehouse even though it is not the final intended warehouse or 60 days is still not over.
If the
assured decides to store the goods in any warehouse for the purpose of
allocation/distribution of his goods or simply for storage , again the cover
terminates even before reaching the final intended warehouse.
Finally,
there is a cap of 60 days from date of discharge from oversea vessel. However this 60
days is only a limit. For example if on the 15th day, the
assured decides to bond the goods in a bonded warehouse, cover terminates.
The
duration clause also uses a phrase “ordinary course of transit”. What does this
phrase mean? In marine cargo insurance it is recognised that during the
transportation of goods there would be incidental storages which are in the
ordinary course of transit. For example goods will be in port premises pending customs examination, in Carriers’
warehouses etc. So long as the goods are in their ordinary course of transit,
cover continues. A good example of a storage which is not in the ordinary
course of transit is storage for the convenience of the assured.
Clause
8.2: if the assured decides to change the original destination, then cover
ceases when goods leave the port for commencement of transit to the new
destination. In such cases the assured should request the insurer to hold him
covered.
8.3: the
duration clause adds comforting held covered provisions in this section-any
delay beyond the control of the assured, deviation, transhipment etc does not
terminate the cover.
To understand the duration of cover, Clause 8
should be read along with Clauses 9 and 10.
Though all the three Clauses viz. A, B and C provide for warehouse to warehouse cover, this is to be read along with the insurable interest clause. Thus if the assured is an FOB seller, he does not automatically get the benefit of the warehouse to warehouse clause i.e., the risk would cease when he loads the cargo on board the oversea vessel. Sometimes Insurers modify the duration of cover in ICC by writing “no cover after discharge” or restricting cover only upto port of discharge and excluding inland transit to final destination. In other words the Duration stated in the Certificate of Insurance would override the printed clause (i.e, the duration clause containing in ICC providing a warehouse to warehouse cover). For example, the Certificate may provide for cover until unloading from the vessel at discharge port.
Institute Cargo Clauses-B and C:
ICC(B)
|
ICC (C)
|
|
Loss of or damage to the subject-matter insured reasonably attributable to:
|
||
fire or
explosion
|
V
|
V
|
vessel
or craft being
stranded grounded
sunk or
capsized
|
V
|
V
|
overturning
or derailment
of land conveyance |
V
|
V
|
collision
or contact of vessel craft or conveyance with any
|
V
|
V
|
discharge
of cargo at a
port of distress |
V
|
V
|
earthquake
volcanic
eruption or lightning, |
V
|
X
|
Loss of or damage to the subject-matter insured caused by:
|
||
general
average sacrifice
|
V
|
V
|
jettison
or washing
overboard |
V
|
Only Jettison, not W.O.B
|
entry
of sea lake or river
water into vessel craft hold conveyance container
liftvan
or place of storage,
|
V
|
X
|
total
loss of any package lost overboard or dropped whilst loading on to, or
unloading from, vessel or craft
|
V
|
X
|
ICC B and C are often used for used /second-hand goods, bulk cargoes.
Following is a list of commonly used add on covers (called non-Institute or broker wordings) used along with ICC:
Standard Add On covers
|
Institute Cargo Clauses (A)
|
Remarks
|
Airfreight Replacement Clause/Expediting
Expenses Clause
|
Not covered if the original insured
transit was by sea
|
Often there is a cap on the
recoverable amount.
|
Brand Protection Clause
|
ICC covers only physical loss or damage and not protection of brand names
|
Provides protection by giving a final say
to the Assured regarding disposal of damaged cargo as salvage. Again various
versions of this clause are available.
|
Buyer’s Interest (Contingency)
coverage
|
Not provided for
|
-do-
|
Concealed Damage (also called Delayed Discovery
of Loss Clause)
|
Burden of proof on Assured to prove
that the loss took place during the insured period
|
Concealed Loss covered under the
policy subject to discovery of loss/reporting of loss within 30/60 days
(standard is 30 days but sometimes extended to 60 days by the insurer if there is a valid reason
for this request)
|
Difference in Conditions coverage
|
Not provided for
|
-do-
|
Full GA Clause
|
GA and Salvage charges are covered but subject to
under-insurance
|
No underinsurance applied
|
Insolvency of shipowners, charterers
etc
|
Excluded (see Clause 4.6)
|
Exclusion wording significantly
modified in favour of the Assured
|
Insufficiency of Packing
|
Excluded (See Clause 4.3)
|
The insurer cannot invoke the defence
of insufficiency if the Assured’s privity was not involved. For example
import cargo where cargo is packed by seller and not the assured buyer
|
Loading and Unloading Clause
|
It is often not realised but ICC(A)
does not include loading risks inside the warehouse
|
The loading/ Unloading clause will
provide this cover whether loading inside or outside your warehouse
|
Presentation Packing/Packing Clauses
|
ICC (A) covers goods and not the
packing thereof
|
Packing itself covered so that
repacking and/or repair charges are part of the claim
|
Removal of Debris-often a severe
burden on the assured
|
Not covered
|
Covered upto (usually) 20% of the sum insured.
|
Return Cargo Clause
|
Not provided for
|
|
Seller’s Interest (Contingency)
coverage
|
Not provided for
|
There are different versions of this
clause and utmost care need to be exercised to understand the cover being provided.
|
Shortage and/or Non Delivery from Seal
intact containers
|
No coverage unless Assured is able
to prove a skilful pilferage. Again the burden of proving the loss took place
during the currency of the policy is on the assured if the seal of the
container arrives intact
|
Such a clause has a limited value-read
Insuring Cargoes for a detailed comemntary
|
Storage at forwarder’s consolidators,
hauliers, warehousemen, exhibition, demonstration, trade fair or show
premises
|
Not always provided for unless within the 'ordinary course of transit'
|
The Open Cover should have a Duration of Cover wording that overrides
the duration of the ICC
|
There are a number of manuscript wordings but the
above is a list of the more popular ones.
In Marine Insurance, the assured is
under a duty to take all reasonable measures to avert or minimise a loss (See
Duty of the Assured clause in ICC A, B and C/MIA S. 78(4). ICC A, B and C
provide for such expenses, reasonably incurred to be reimbursed if such
expenses were taken as there was an imminent risk of a loss/damage from an
insured peril, such costs were incurred to save the insured cargo and these
costs were extrodinary costs.
Note:
The book Insuring Cargoes contains a very detailed chaper on Institute
Cargo Clauses supported by caselaws from English and American courts. It
also critically examines some of the broker woredings.
To be continued
To be continued
(a) its actual total loss appears to be
unavoidable, or
(b) in order to prevent it from becoming a
total loss, expenditure greater than its value when preserved would have to be
incurred.
[2] It is the duty of an Assured to act at all
times as a prudent uninsured, and to take whatever steps are reasonably and
properly necessary in order to avoid or minimise an insured loss. Even if such
steps are not successful and the insured loss is not avoided or minimised the
Assured is nonetheless entitled to recover his sue and labour costs and
expenses in addition to his loss, subject only to the sue and labour expenses
being limited again to the value insured.

Good effort in setting up this blog. Applause.
ReplyDeleteChance upon this wonderful blog, in my research.
I've have a question, and perhaps you can shed some light.
International Trade often involves a party commonly know as the middleman. An example of their common trade practice:
The middleman would purchase the goods from their supplier from china on C.I.F. terms ( at a price of $500K)
The middleman would inturn sell their goods to the ultimate buyer in indonesia on C.I.F. terms (at a price of $700K)
Goods is arranged to be shipped direct from their supplier in china, to their buyer in indonesia.
Coverage is arranged by the supplier in China base on the middleman purchase price of $500K + 10pct, covering the entire voyage from China to Indonesia.
The middleman would then need to take up another policy covering the goods from China to their buyer in Indonesia, base on their selling price ( $700K + 10pct)
But i'm having doubts on such arrangement, on the aspect of "double insurance" issues, if any.
Could a Sellers' interest policy be worded or arranged to the benefits of the middleman?
I have underwritten lot of traders based in Hong Kong who would procure goods from China and sell to various buyers worldwide. The middleman (trader) would raise their own invoice and cover warehouse to warehouse and assign the certificate to the overseas buyer. This system worked well because the middleman will always insure for USD 700K instead of 500K. In your example, the situation is different. One way is to change the contract of sale as suggested above. Alternatively you could negotiate a higher markup with the insurer (Insurer will be reticent in agreeing for makrups over 20% !). Another alternative is to have an agreement that if the middleman is the claimant he would get the Purchase Price plus 10% but if the Indoensia buyer is the claimant, it should be based on 700 K plus 10%. Another alternative is to insure for 500K plus the max markup given by Chinese Insurer and ask the Indoensian buyer to arrange an increased value insurance in his own country.
ReplyDeleteVish, can below solution applied?
ReplyDelete1. The middleman (trader) buy FOB from Supplier in China and arrange Cargo Insurance on FOB basis from CHina port to Final destination in Indonesia?
2. If the trader is to insure for 500K plus the max markup given by Chinese Insurer and ask the Indoensian buyer to arrange an increased value insurance in his own country - Does this disclose to the Indonesia Buyer the actual invoice of $500K?
This is what I had suggested as one of the options i.e, the Indoensia buyer arrange an IV Policy. If the only invoice the indoensian buyer will get is that of the Middleman, then the buyer will not know of 500K. But how about B/L? The way some trader operate is they "switch" Bills of Lading. For example A in Malaysia sells to a trader B in Singapore who sells to Buyer C in India. The loadport B/L will show A as the seller and B as the buyer but then the B/Ls will be swtiched at Singapore (transhipment port) when the loadport B/Ls will be surrendered to the shipping company who will now issue a new set of B/L showing B in singapore as the seller and C as the buyer. Got it? This way the buyer in India does not know that goods have been purchased from A in Malaysia. This is an acceptable trade practice-nothing illegal about it from what I know. In future please write you name, where you work for and if possible your email id. Are you already a member of the blog? Please do so and insert your photo-knowing people in various countries is what keeps me going with this blog despite my stiff travel schedule! Regards
ReplyDelete