Insuring Cargo on You Tube

An Appreciation by Phillip Taylor MBE and Elizabeth Taylor of Richmond Green Chambers

Followers

Thursday, January 12, 2012

Guide to Marine Insurance-Part 7

Institute Cargo Clauses (ICC)
The 1982 version of ICC A/B/C/Air and associated War/Strikes clauses have been replaced by the 2009 edition. 

Other Clauses such as Institute Frozen Food/Bulk Oil etc Clauses are undergoing revision and will be released by the Joint Cargo Committee (JCC) soon.
Many markets are yet to adopt the 2009 edition and continue to use the 1982 edition.

This article examines the 1982 edition-a later article in this series will examine  2009 edition

 General Notes 
 ICC A is an all risks form. The emphasis is on risk and therefore any fortuitous loss or damage is covered unless any of the exclusions operate.
 ICC B and C are named perils Clauses.

Coverage provided by ICC (A), (B) and (C)- (applicable to both 1982 and 2009 editions):

  1. Actual Total Loss 
  2. Constructive Total Loss[1] 
  3. Particular Average i.e. partial loss to the cargo by an insured peril in case of B and   C and by any fortuity/accidental cause(s) in the case of ICC (A) 
  4. General Average Sacrifice 
  5. General Average and Salvage Contributions 
  6. Collision Liability (Both to Blame
  7. Expenses such as :
·          Survey Fee and Reconditioning costs
·          Sue & Labour expenses (those incurred to prevent/minimize a loss)[2]
·          Forwarding Expenses (when transit is terminated short of destination)

Though not specified as such all these clauses only cover physical loss of or damage to goods so that claim  on account of goods (otherwise in a sound condition) arriving late so as to miss the Christmas sales will not be admissible under these clauses.

ICC (A) is an all risks form subject to exclusions whereas (B) and (C) are named-perils form (and also contain a set of exclusions). This has an implication of burden of proof as detailed below
All Risks is a legal term-it does not literally mean all risks-the loss or damage must be caused by a fortuity and there are named exclusions.

Burden of Proof:
The assured must prove, on a balance of probabilities that accidental or fortuitous loss or damage has occurred during the period of  transit covered by the policy.” However in an all risk form such as ICC (A), the assured does not have to prove the exact nature of the peril that caused his loss.
Under the named-perils form such as ICC (B) and (C) the assured is required to prove on a balance of probabilities that the loss was reasonably attributable to one of the listed perils (compare this with the position in ICC (A) Clauses).

The Insurer’s burden of proof: Once the assured overcomes the initial hurdle of proving a fortuity (A) or a named peril (B or C), the burden then shifts to the Insurer to prove an exclusion-which is a heavier burden under A clauses.

In practical terms, the assured discharges his burden of proof by means of documentation viz., a clean B/L and a damage/shortage report at destination.

Exclusions:
In ICC (A) the following are the exclusions:

4.1         Wilful misconduct of the assured
4.2         Ordinary leakage, ordinary loss in weight or volume, or ordinary wear and tear
4.3       Insufficiency of packing/unsuitability of packing or preparation of the cargo (includingstowage in a container if carried out  prior to attachment of the insurance of by the assured or his servants
4.4         Inherent Vice or nature of cargo
4.5         Loss damage expense caused by delay even if delay is due to an insured peril
4.6       Exclusion relating to financial insolvency or default of shipowners/managers/charterers/operators of the vessels
4.7         Nuclear etc exclusion
4.8         Unseaworthiness/Unfitness
4.9         War exclusion
4.10       Strikes exclusion

Exclusions 6 and 7 relate to war and strikes. There is a separate war and strikes clauses available at an additonal premium. It should be noted that Institute War and Institute Strike Clauses do not override all the perils excluded in 6  and 7 and only provide for war and war like perils. 

There are add-on clauses (non-Institute or manuscript wordings to override or water down some of these exclusions)-see later part of this article.

Note: These exclusions are common to A, B and C clauses but ICC B and C have one more exclusion “deliberate damage or destruction…… by an act of any person(s).”

Duration of Cover
8 8.1      This insurance attaches from the time the goods leave the warehouse or place of storage at the place named herein for the commencement of the transit, continues during the ordinary course of transit and terminates either
8.1.1      on delivery to the Consignees' or other final warehouse or place of storage at the destination named herein,
8.1.2      on delivery to any other warehouse or place of storage, whether prior to or at the destination named herein, which the Assured elect to use either
8.1.2.        for storage other than in the ordinary course of transit or
8.1.2.2      for allocation or distribution,
or
8.1.3       on the expiry of 60 days after completion of discharge overside of the goods hereby insured from the oversea vessel at the final port of discharge,
          
 whichever shall first occur.

8.2     If, after discharge overside from the oversea vessel at the final port of discharge, but prior to termination of this insurance, the goods are to be forwarded to a destination other than that to which they are insured hereunder, this insurance, whilst remaining subject to termination as provided for above, shall not extend beyond the commencement of transit to such other destination.
8.3     This insurance shall remain in force (subject to termination as provided for above and to the provisions of Clause 9 below) during delay beyond the control of the Assured, any deviation, forced discharge, reshipment or transhipment and during any variation of the adventure arising from the exercise of a liberty granted to shipowners or charterers under the contract of affreightment.

Explanation
When does the cover attach? 

This happens when goods leave the warehouse/place of storage for commencement of transit. If the lorry carrying the goods gets engulfed within the warehouse complex, there is no cover since the goods have to leave the gate of the factory or the warehouse (the “threshold test”). Loading onto the vehicle parked outside the gate is covered. 

Brokers often add the Loading and Unloading Clause in order to override this restriction in the 1982 edition of ICC.

When does the cover terminate? It will be noted that Clause 8 provides for a number of situations when cover might terminate:

When goods are delivered to the Consignees’ warehouse or any place of storage. Thus if goods are unloaded at port of discharge but the assured decides to put the goods in a bonded warehouse for his convenience (e.g. lack of storage space in his warehouse/factory or waiting for exchange rate to be in his favour before he clears the goods from customs etc), cover terminates when goods enter the bonded warehouse even though it is not the final intended warehouse or 60 days is still not over.

If the assured decides to store the goods in any warehouse for the purpose of allocation/distribution of his goods or simply for storage , again the cover terminates even before reaching the final intended warehouse.

Finally, there is a cap of 60 days from date of discharge from oversea vessel. However this 60 days is only a limit.  For example if on the 15th day, the assured decides to bond the goods in a bonded warehouse, cover terminates.

The duration clause also uses a phrase “ordinary course of transit”. What does this phrase mean? In marine cargo insurance it is recognised that during the transportation of goods there would be incidental storages which are in the ordinary course of transit. For example goods will be in port premises  pending customs examination, in Carriers’ warehouses etc. So long as the goods are in their ordinary course of transit, cover continues. A good example of a storage which is not in the ordinary course of transit is storage for the convenience of the assured.

Clause 8.2: if the assured decides to change the original destination, then cover ceases when goods leave the port for commencement of transit to the new destination. In such cases the assured should request the insurer to hold him covered.

8.3: the duration clause adds comforting held covered provisions in this section-any delay beyond the control of the assured, deviation, transhipment etc does not terminate the cover.

To understand the duration of cover, Clause 8 should be read along with Clauses 9 and 10.

Though all the three Clauses viz. A, B and C provide for warehouse to warehouse cover, this is to be read along with the insurable interest clause. Thus if the assured is an FOB seller, he does not automatically get the benefit of the warehouse to warehouse clause  i.e., the risk  would cease when he loads the cargo on board the oversea vessel.  Sometimes Insurers modify the duration of cover in ICC by writing “no cover after discharge” or restricting cover only upto port of discharge and excluding inland transit to final destination. In other words the Duration stated in the Certificate of Insurance would override the printed clause (i.e, the duration clause containing in ICC providing a warehouse to warehouse cover). For example, the Certificate may provide for cover until unloading from the vessel at discharge port.

Institute Cargo Clauses-B and C:



ICC(B)
ICC (C)
Loss of or damage to the subject-matter  insured reasonably attributable to:
fire or explosion
V
V
vessel or craft being 
stranded grounded
sunk or capsized
V
V
overturning or derailment 
of land conveyance
V
V
collision or contact of vessel craft or conveyance with any
V
V
discharge of cargo at a 
port of distress 
V
V
earthquake volcanic 
eruption or lightning,
V
X
Loss of or damage to the subject-matter insured caused by:
general average sacrifice
V
V
jettison or washing 
overboard
V
Only Jettison, not W.O.B
entry of sea lake or river 
water into vessel craft 
hold conveyance container
liftvan or place of storage,
V
X
total loss of any package lost overboard or dropped whilst loading on to, or unloading from, vessel or craft
V
X

ICC B and C are often used for used /second-hand goods, bulk cargoes.

Following is a list of commonly used add on covers (called non-Institute or broker wordings) used  along with ICC:

Standard Add On covers
Institute Cargo Clauses (A)
Remarks



Airfreight Replacement Clause/Expediting Expenses Clause
Not covered if the original insured transit was by sea
Often there is a cap on the recoverable amount.
Brand Protection Clause
ICC covers only physical loss or damage and not protection of brand names 
Provides protection by giving a final say to the Assured regarding disposal of damaged cargo as salvage. Again various versions of this clause are available.
Buyer’s Interest (Contingency) coverage
Not provided for
-do-
Concealed Damage (also called Delayed Discovery of Loss Clause)
Burden of proof on Assured to prove that the loss took place during the insured period
Concealed Loss covered under the policy subject to discovery of loss/reporting of loss within 30/60 days (standard is 30 days but sometimes extended to 60 days  by the insurer if there is a valid reason for this request)
Difference in Conditions coverage
Not provided for
-do-
Full GA Clause
GA and Salvage charges are covered  but subject to under-insurance
No underinsurance applied
Insolvency of shipowners, charterers etc
Excluded (see Clause 4.6)
Exclusion wording significantly
modified in favour of the Assured
Insufficiency of Packing
Excluded (See Clause 4.3)
The insurer cannot invoke the defence of insufficiency if the Assured’s privity was not involved. For example import cargo where cargo is packed by seller and not the assured buyer
Loading and Unloading Clause
It is often not realised but ICC(A) does not include loading risks inside the warehouse
 The loading/ Unloading clause will provide this cover whether loading inside or outside your warehouse
Presentation Packing/Packing Clauses
ICC (A) covers goods and not the packing thereof
Packing itself covered so that repacking and/or repair charges are part of the claim
Removal of Debris-often a severe burden on the assured
Not covered
Covered upto (usually) 20% of the sum insured.
Return Cargo Clause
Not provided for

Seller’s Interest (Contingency) coverage
Not provided for
There are different versions of this clause and utmost care need to be exercised to understand the cover being provided.
Shortage and/or Non Delivery from Seal intact containers
No coverage unless Assured is able to prove a skilful pilferage. Again the burden of proving the loss took place during the currency of the policy is on the assured if the seal of the container arrives intact
Such a clause has a limited value-read Insuring Cargoes for a detailed comemntary
Storage at forwarder’s consolidators, hauliers, warehousemen, exhibition, demonstration, trade fair or show premises
Not always provided for unless within the 'ordinary course of transit'
The Open Cover should have a  Duration of Cover wording that overrides the duration of the ICC
There are a number of manuscript wordings but the above is a list of the more popular ones.

In Marine Insurance, the assured is under a duty to take all reasonable measures to avert or minimise a loss (See Duty of the Assured clause in ICC A, B and C/MIA S. 78(4). ICC A, B and C provide for such expenses, reasonably incurred to be reimbursed if such expenses were taken as there was an imminent risk of a loss/damage from an insured peril, such costs were incurred to save the insured cargo and these costs were extrodinary costs.


Note: The book Insuring Cargoes contains a very detailed chaper on Institute Cargo Clauses supported by caselaws from English and American courts. It also critically examines some of the broker woredings.

To be continued


[1] A CTL occurs when the subject matter insured is so damaged that either:
        (a)   its actual total loss appears to be unavoidable, or
       (b)   in order to prevent it from becoming a total loss, expenditure greater than its value when preserved would have to be incurred.


[2] It is the duty of an Assured to act at all times as a prudent uninsured, and to take whatever steps are reasonably and properly necessary in order to avoid or minimise an insured loss. Even if such steps are not successful and the insured loss is not avoided or minimised the Assured is nonetheless entitled to recover his sue and labour costs and expenses in addition to his loss, subject only to the sue and labour expenses being limited again to the value insured.

4 comments:

  1. Good effort in setting up this blog. Applause.

    Chance upon this wonderful blog, in my research.

    I've have a question, and perhaps you can shed some light.

    International Trade often involves a party commonly know as the middleman. An example of their common trade practice:

    The middleman would purchase the goods from their supplier from china on C.I.F. terms ( at a price of $500K)
    The middleman would inturn sell their goods to the ultimate buyer in indonesia on C.I.F. terms (at a price of $700K)

    Goods is arranged to be shipped direct from their supplier in china, to their buyer in indonesia.

    Coverage is arranged by the supplier in China base on the middleman purchase price of $500K + 10pct, covering the entire voyage from China to Indonesia.

    The middleman would then need to take up another policy covering the goods from China to their buyer in Indonesia, base on their selling price ( $700K + 10pct)

    But i'm having doubts on such arrangement, on the aspect of "double insurance" issues, if any.

    Could a Sellers' interest policy be worded or arranged to the benefits of the middleman?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have underwritten lot of traders based in Hong Kong who would procure goods from China and sell to various buyers worldwide. The middleman (trader) would raise their own invoice and cover warehouse to warehouse and assign the certificate to the overseas buyer. This system worked well because the middleman will always insure for USD 700K instead of 500K. In your example, the situation is different. One way is to change the contract of sale as suggested above. Alternatively you could negotiate a higher markup with the insurer (Insurer will be reticent in agreeing for makrups over 20% !). Another alternative is to have an agreement that if the middleman is the claimant he would get the Purchase Price plus 10% but if the Indoensia buyer is the claimant, it should be based on 700 K plus 10%. Another alternative is to insure for 500K plus the max markup given by Chinese Insurer and ask the Indoensian buyer to arrange an increased value insurance in his own country.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Vish, can below solution applied?

    1. The middleman (trader) buy FOB from Supplier in China and arrange Cargo Insurance on FOB basis from CHina port to Final destination in Indonesia?

    2. If the trader is to insure for 500K plus the max markup given by Chinese Insurer and ask the Indoensian buyer to arrange an increased value insurance in his own country - Does this disclose to the Indonesia Buyer the actual invoice of $500K?

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is what I had suggested as one of the options i.e, the Indoensia buyer arrange an IV Policy. If the only invoice the indoensian buyer will get is that of the Middleman, then the buyer will not know of 500K. But how about B/L? The way some trader operate is they "switch" Bills of Lading. For example A in Malaysia sells to a trader B in Singapore who sells to Buyer C in India. The loadport B/L will show A as the seller and B as the buyer but then the B/Ls will be swtiched at Singapore (transhipment port) when the loadport B/Ls will be surrendered to the shipping company who will now issue a new set of B/L showing B in singapore as the seller and C as the buyer. Got it? This way the buyer in India does not know that goods have been purchased from A in Malaysia. This is an acceptable trade practice-nothing illegal about it from what I know. In future please write you name, where you work for and if possible your email id. Are you already a member of the blog? Please do so and insert your photo-knowing people in various countries is what keeps me going with this blog despite my stiff travel schedule! Regards

    ReplyDelete

Blog Archive

About the Author

My Photo
Bangalore, India
Starting his career in 1981, he has been a part of senior management of multinational insurance companies in India. He has worked in international markets including 5 years in Hong Kong. He has visited a number of countries (often as a guest speaker) - United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, France, China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia, Nigeria,Zambia and Dubai. He has been a contributor to international journals including Lloyd’s List of UK. Vish is the author of Insuring Cargoes-A practical guide to its law and practice [2010] published by the prestigious Witherbys of UK. Vish has his own consultancy firm engaged in running insurance programmes of corporates. Besides marine cargo and hull & machinery, he is also well versed in other classes of business including Business Interruption. Another area of his involvement is technical training- Vish conducts high quality technical training for brokers, underwriters and claims adjusters in various parts of the world. Recently Vish was appointed as the Indian Market Consultant for Dolphin Maritime& Aviation Services